• Home
    • John Le Carre
    • Text Radio
    • Sideways Dictionary
    • Teach First
    • Showtown
    • Paper Wraps Stone
    • Cambridge University
    • Realtime Notes
    • Perpetual Disappointments Diary
    • Historic Houses
    • Generation Press
    • Action for Children
    • Cystic Fibrosis
    • Unicef
    • Creative Review
    • Paul Dalling
    • Mozilla
    • Zhuck
    • Healthy mealtimes
    • Paul Thompson
    • Little Chef
    • Smith & Milton
    • A Smile in the Mind
    • Poetry
    • Mr Blog
    • Pentone
  • Art by Sue Asbury
    • Biogs
    • Press
    • Contact
  • News
  • Shop
Menu

Asbury & Asbury

  • Home
  • Writing by Nick Asbury
    • John Le Carre
    • Text Radio
    • Sideways Dictionary
    • Teach First
    • Showtown
    • Paper Wraps Stone
    • Cambridge University
    • Realtime Notes
    • Perpetual Disappointments Diary
    • Historic Houses
    • Generation Press
    • Action for Children
    • Cystic Fibrosis
    • Unicef
    • Creative Review
    • Paul Dalling
    • Mozilla
    • Zhuck
    • Healthy mealtimes
    • Paul Thompson
    • Little Chef
    • Smith & Milton
    • A Smile in the Mind
    • Poetry
    • Mr Blog
    • Pentone
  • Art by Sue Asbury
  • About
    • Biogs
    • Press
    • Contact
  • News
  • Shop
DOLkjzPUEAEEzKH.jpg

14 ways of looking at 280 characters

November 9, 2017
tweetcr.png

I've written a piece for Creative Review about Twitter's move from 140 to 280 characters. You can read it here.

It's not written from any particularly strongly held opinion — more an exploration of different ways of looking at it. 

My instinct is increasingly that it might not matter that much.

But please read the post anyway. 

Tags Creative Review
← Taste the indifferenceOn brand stories →